4.5 Article

Xanthine Oxidase Inhibition With Febuxostat Attenuates Systolic Overload-Induced Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Dysfunction in Mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 746-753

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2008.06.006

关键词

left ventricular dysfunction; myocardial hypertrophy; pressure overload; xanthine oxidase inhibition

资金

  1. TAP Pharmaceutical Products Inc
  2. National Institutes of Health [HL71790, HL21872]
  3. American Heart Association, National Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purine analog xanthine oxidase (XO) inhibitors (XOIs), allopurinol and oxypurinol, have been reported to protect against heart failure secondary to myocardial infarction or rapid ventricular pacing. Because these agents might influence other aspects of purine metabolism that could influence their effect, this study examined the effect of the non-purine XOI, febuxostat, on pressure overload-induced left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and dysfunction. Transverse aortic constriction (TAC) in mice caused LV hypertrophy and dysfunction and increased myocardial nitrotyrosine at 8 days. TAC also caused increased phosphorylated Akt (p-Akt(Ser473)) p42/44 extracellular signal-regulated kinase (p-ErKThr202/Tyr204), and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) (p-mTOR(Ser2488)). XO inhibition with febuxostat (5 mg/kg/d by gavage for 8 days) beginning approximately 60 minutes after TAC attenuated the TAC-induced LV hypertrophy and dysfunction. Febuxostat blunted the TAC-induced increases in nitrotyrosine (indicating reduced myocardial oxidative stress), p-Erk(Thr202/Tyr204), and p-mTOR(Ser2488), with no effect on total Erk or total mTOR. Febuxostat had no effect on myocardial p-Akt(Ser473) or total Akt. The results suggest that XO inhibition with febuxostat reduced oxidative stress in the pressure overloaded LV, thereby diminishing the activation of pathways that result in pathologic hypertrophy and contractile dysfunction. (J Cardiac Fail 2008:14:746-753)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据