4.6 Article

Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 receptor ligand (Flt3L)-based vaccination administered with an adenoviral vector prevents tumor growth of colorectal cancer in a BALB/c mouse model

期刊

JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 139, 期 12, 页码 2097-2110

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-013-1532-z

关键词

Colon carcinoma; Adenovirus; Gene therapy; Mouse model; Flt3L

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Colorectal cancer is the third most frequent cancer in industrial nations. Therapeutic strategies to treat metastatic disease and prevent recurrence are needed. Anti-tumor immunity can be induced by dendritic cells. Dendritic cells can be expanded by the fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (Flt3L) in vivo. The aim of this study was to develop an adenoviral-based immune-gene therapy of colorectal cancer with Flt3L in a BALB/c mouse model. A new Flt3L-encoding adenoviral vector (pAdFlt3L) was administered in two approaches in a CT26 colon cancer model in female BALB/c mice. In the therapeutic approach, pAdFlt3L was injected into the tail vein or directly into subcutaneous CT26 colon carcinoma tumors in BALB/c mice. In the vaccination protocol, mice were vaccinated with CT26 cell lysate and pAdFlt3L subcutaneous prior to subcutaneous application of vital CT26 cells. Application of pAdFlt3L led to high levels of Flt3L in vitro and in vivo. Significant expansion of dendritic cells after application of pAdFlt3L in vivo was confirmed by the use of CD11c and CD11b surface markers in immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry (p = 0.019). In the therapeutic approach, neither intravenous nor intratumoral treatments with pAdFlt3L lead to regression of CT26 tumors. In the vaccination protocol, vaccination completely prevented tumor growth and resulted in superior survival compared to control mice (p < 0.001). Our results demonstrate that immunostimulatory therapy with pAdFlt3L is effective to prevent tumor development through vaccination and may represent a therapeutic tool to prevent metastatic disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据