4.6 Article

PIK3CA mutation is associated with poor survival among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer following anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy: a meta-analysis

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-013-1400-x

关键词

PIK3CA; Metastatic colorectal cancer; Meta-analysis; Monoclonal antibody; Mutation

类别

资金

  1. Research Fund of Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau [2009011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PIK3CA mutation appears to predict a lack of response to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the predictive value of PIK3CA mutations for survival remains inconclusive. Here, we pooled the data from published studies to estimate the association between PIK3CA mutation and survival outcomes in mCRC patients treated with anti-EGFR mAbs. Studies investigating the association of PIK3CA mutations with clinical survival outcomes of mCRC patients treated with anti-EGFR mAbs were systematically identified. The overall hazard ratio (HR) was estimated by using fixed effect model or random effect model according to heterogeneity between trails. Eight studies that reported survival outcome in 839 mCRC patients were included. In unselected patients, we found that PIK3CA mutations were significantly associated with poorer PFS [8 studies, 839 patients; HR = 1.53; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.28-1.84; P < 0.001] and OS (5 studies; 587 patients; HR = 1.28; 95 % CI 1.05-1.56; P = 0.015). With increased predictive power in KRAS wild-type patients (3 studies; 275 patients), the overall HR for PFS was 2.44 (95 % CI 1.33-4.48; P = 0.004) and was statistically significant. We also observed a worse OS in KRAS wild-type patients with PIK3CA mutations (2 studies; 163 patients; HR = 1.37; 95 % CI 0.80-2.35; P = 0.258), although the result was not statistically significant due to small sample size. PIK3CA mutation is a promising predictive biomarker for poor survival in mCRC patients treated with anti-EGFR mAbs, particularly in KRAS wild-type patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据