4.6 Article

Digital PCR quantification of miRNAs in sputum for diagnosis of lung cancer

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-013-1555-5

关键词

Digital PCR; miRNAs; Sputum; Diagnosis; Lung cancer

类别

资金

  1. NCI [R01CA161837]
  2. VA merit Award [I01 CX000512]
  3. LUNGevity/Upstage Foundation Early Detection Award
  4. University of Maryland Cancer Epidemiology Alliance Seed Grant
  5. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA161837] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. Veterans Affairs [I01CX000512] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play important roles in the initiation and progression of lung cancer. Measuring miRNA expression levels in sputum could provide a potential approach for the diagnosis of lung cancer. The emerging digital PCR is a straightforward technique for precise, direct, and absolute quantification of nucleic acids. The objective of the study was to investigate whether digital PCR could be used to quantify miRNAs in sputum for lung cancer diagnosis. We first determined and compared dynamic ranges of digital PCR and conventional quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) for miRNA quantification using RNA isolated from sputum of five healthy individuals. We then used digital PCR to quantify copy number of two lung cancer-associated miRNAs (miR-31 and miR-210) in 35 lung cancer patients and 40 cancer-free controls. Copy number of the miRNAs measured by digital PCR displayed a linear response to input cDNA amount in a twofold dilution series over seven orders of magnitude. miRNA quantification determined by digital PCR assay was in good agreement with that obtained from qRT-PCR analysis in sputum. Furthermore, combined quantification of miR-31 and miR-210 copy number by using digital PCR in sputum of the cases and controls provided 65.71 % sensitivity and 85.00 % specificity for lung cancer diagnosis. As digital PCR becomes more established, it would be a robust tool for quantitative assessment of miRNA copy number in sputum for lung cancer diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据