4.6 Article

Detection and identification of potential biomarkers of breast cancer

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-010-0775-1

关键词

Biomarker; Breast cancer; LC-MS/MS; MALDI-TOF-MS; Proteomics; SELDI-TOF-MS

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30772273]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Noninvasive and convenient biomarkers for early diagnosis of breast cancer remain an urgent need. The aim of this study was to discover and identify potential protein biomarkers specific for breast cancer. Methods Two hundred and eighty-two ( 282) serum samples with 124 breast cancer and 158 controls were randomly divided into a training set and a blind-testing set. Serum proteomic profiles were analyzed using SELDI-TOF-MS. Candidate biomarkers were purified by HPLC, identified by LC-MS/MS and validated using Protein-Chip immunoassays and western blot technique. Results A total of 3 peaks (m/z with 6,630, 8,139 and 8,942 Da) were screened out by support vector machine to construct the classification model with high discriminatory power in the training set. The sensitivity and specificity of the model were 96.45 and 94.87%, respectively, in the blind-testing set. The candidate biomarker with m/z of 6,630 Da was found to be down-regulated in breast cancer patients, and was identified as apolipoprotein C-I. Another two candidate biomarkers (8,139, 8,942 Da) were found up-regulated in breast cancer and identified as C-terminal-truncated form of C3a and complement component C3a, respectively. In addition, the level of apolipoprotein C-I progressively decreased with the clinical stages I, II, III and IV, and the expression of C-terminal-truncated form of C3a and complement component C3a gradually increased in higher stages. Conclusions We have identified a set of biomarkers that could discriminate breast cancer from non-cancer controls. An efficient strategy, including SELDI-TOF-MS analysis, HPLC purification, MALDI-TOF-MS trace and LC-MS/MS identification, has been proved very successful.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据