4.5 Article

Isolation and characterization of antibody fragments selective for toxic oligomeric tau

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 36, 期 3, 页码 1342-1355

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.12.002

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Toxic tau aggregates; Phage display; Brain tissue; Biomarker; scFv; Oligomeric tau; Antibody fragments; Immunotherapy

资金

  1. Arizona Department of Health Services for Arizona Department of Health Services for Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium
  2. National Institute on Aging (Arizona Alzheimer's Disease Core Center) [P30 AG19610]
  3. Arizona Department of Health Services (Arizona Alzheimer's Research Center) [211002]
  4. Arizona Biomedical Research Commission [4001, 0011, 05-901, 1001]
  5. NIH [R44AG029777]
  6. NIA [AG029777]
  7. Prescott Family Initiative of the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oligomeric tau species are important in the onset and progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD), as they are neurotoxic and can propagate tau-tangle pathology. Therefore, reagents that selectively recognize different key morphologies of tau are needed to help define the role of tau in AD and related diseases. We utilized a biopanning protocol that combines the binding diversity of phage-displayed antibody libraries with the powerful imaging capability of atomic force microscopy to isolate single-chain antibody fragments (scFvs) that selectively bind toxic oligomeric tau. We isolated 3 different antibody fragments that bind oligomeric but not monomeric or fibrillar tau. The scFvs differentiate brain tissue homogenates of both 3xTG and tau-AD mice from wild-type mice, detecting oligomeric tau at much earlier ages than when neurofibrillary tangles are typically detected. The scFvs also distinguish human postmortem AD brain tissue from cognitively normal postmortem human brain tissue, demonstrating the potential of this approach for developing biomarkers for early detection and progression of AD. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据