4.5 Article

Epigenetic modifications in mouse cerebellar Purkinje cells: effects of aging, caloric restriction, and overexpression of superoxide dismutase 1 on 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 36, 期 11, 页码 3079-3089

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.08.001

关键词

DNA methylation; DNA hydroxymethylation; Purkinje cells; Aging; Caloric restriction; Antioxidant overexpression

资金

  1. Internationale Stichting Alzheimer Onderzoek (ISAO) [07551, 11532, 09552, 13515]
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [916.11.086]
  3. NWO [911.06.086, 022.005.019]
  4. Maastricht University Medical Centre + (Koostra Talent Fellowship)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the present study was to assess alterations in DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation during aging in cerebellar Purkinje cells and to determine the effects of putatively preventative measures to such age-related changes. Using immunohistochemical techniques, 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) immunoreactivity in cerebellar Purkinje cells of 12-monthand 24-month-old mice was interrogated. Additionally, the modulatory effects of caloric restriction (CR) and normal human Cu/Zn super oxide dismutase 1 overexpression on these changes were assessed. We show that aging is associated with an increase of 5-mC and 5-hmC immunoreactivity in mouse cerebellar Purkinje cells. These age-related increases were mitigated by CR but not super oxide dismutase 1 overexpression. Additionally, the ratio between 5-mC and 5-hmC decreased with age and CR treatment, suggesting that CR has a stronger effect on DNA methylation than DNA hydroxymethylation. These findings enforce the notion that aging is closely connected to marked epigenetic changes, affecting multiple brain regions, and that CR is an effective means to prevent or counteract deleterious age-related epigenetic alterations. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据