4.1 Article

The Expression of Glut-1, CAIX, and MCT4 in Mucinous Carcinoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 146-151

出版社

KOREAN BREAST CANCER SOC
DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2013.16.2.146

关键词

Breast; Monocarboxylate transporter 4 protein; Mucinous adenocarcinoma

类别

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2012R1A1A1002886]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A1A1002886] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the expression of metabolism-related proteins including glucose transporter 1 (Glut-1), carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) and monocarboxylate transporter 4 (MCT4) in breast mucinous carcinoma and to evaluate the implications of the results. Methods: Immunohistochemical staining for Glut-1, CAIX, and MCT4 was performed on tissue sections from 59 cases of mucinous carcinoma to evaluate the association between the expression of metabolism-related proteins and clinicopathologic factors. Mucinous carcinoma was subclassified into type A and type B according to histopathological characteristics. Results: Of the 59 patients, 35 patients (59.3%) were type A mucinous carcinoma and 24 patients (40.7%) were type B mucinous carcinoma. Stromal expression of MCT4 was significantly associated with a high histologic grade (p=0.022) and type B mucinous carcinoma (p=0.016). There were significant positive correlations between the expression of Glut-1, CAIX and tumoral expression of MCT4 (p<0.05). Conclusion: We assessed the expression of metabolism-related proteins including Glut-1, CAIX, and MCT4 in breast mucinous carcinoma and found that the stromal expression of MCT4 was higher in type B mucinous carcinoma than in type A, which reflected a difference in the tumor microenvironment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据