4.6 Article

Diagnosis and Management of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Systematic Review and International Consensus

期刊

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 3-23

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2405

关键词

OSTEONECROSIS OF THE JAW; BISPHOSPHONATES; DENOSUMAB; IMAGING; RISK FACTORS; DIAGNOSIS; TREATMENT; MANAGEMENT

资金

  1. Smith and Nephew
  2. Stryker
  3. Amgen
  4. Zimmer
  5. Moximed
  6. Bioventus
  7. Merck
  8. Eli Lilly
  9. Sanofi
  10. De Puy
  11. Servier
  12. NPS
  13. Alexion
  14. Shire
  15. SPA
  16. Bruno Farmaceutici
  17. MSD
  18. Novartis
  19. Actavis
  20. GSK
  21. Alliance for Better Bone Health
  22. Pfizer
  23. Medtronic
  24. Roche
  25. Warner Chilcott
  26. AstraZeneca
  27. IDS
  28. Otsuka
  29. IBMS
  30. Exelixis
  31. Dentsply
  32. Astellas
  33. Axellus
  34. Takeda
  35. Asahi Kasei
  36. Teijin
  37. AbbVie
  38. Amarin
  39. Bristol-Meyers Squibb
  40. Corcept
  41. Endo
  42. Imagepace
  43. Janssen
  44. Noven
  45. Pfizer/Wyeth
  46. Radius
  47. Sanofi-Aventis
  48. MRC [MC_U147585827, MR/K006312/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  49. Medical Research Council [MR/K006312/1, MC_UU_12011/1, MC_U147585827, U1475000001, MC_UP_A620_1014] Funding Source: researchfish
  50. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0508-10082, NF-SI-0513-10085] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work provides a systematic review of the literature from January 2003 to April 2014 pertaining to the incidence, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), and offers recommendations for its management based on multidisciplinary international consensus. ONJ is associated with oncology-dose parenteral antiresorptive therapy of bisphosphonates (BP) and denosumab (Dmab). The incidence of ONJ is greatest in the oncology patient population (1% to 15%), where high doses of these medications are used at frequent intervals. In the osteoporosis patient population, the incidence of ONJ is estimated at 0.001% to 0.01%, marginally higher than the incidence in the general population (<0.001%). New insights into the pathophysiology of ONJ include antiresorptive effects of BPs and Dmab, effects of BPs on gamma delta T-cells and on monocyte and macrophage function, as well as the role of local bacterial infection, inflammation, and necrosis. Advances in imaging include the use of cone beam computerized tomography assessing cortical and cancellous architecture with lower radiation exposure, magnetic resonance imaging, bone scanning, and positron emission tomography, although plain films often suffice. Other risk factors for ONJ include glucocorticoid use, maxillary or mandibular bone surgery, poor oral hygiene, chronic inflammation, diabetes mellitus, ill-fitting dentures, as well as other drugs, including antiangiogenic agents. Prevention strategies for ONJ include elimination or stabilization of oral disease prior to initiation of antiresorptive agents, as well as maintenance of good oral hygiene. In those patients at high risk for the development of ONJ, including cancer patients receiving high-dose BP or Dmab therapy, consideration should be given to withholding antiresorptive therapy following extensive oral surgery until the surgical site heals with mature mucosal coverage. Management of ONJ is based on the stage of the disease, size of the lesions, and the presence of contributing drug therapy and comorbidity. Conservative therapy includes topical antibiotic oral rinses and systemic antibiotic therapy. Localized surgical debridement is indicated in advanced nonresponsive disease and has been successful. Early data have suggested enhanced osseous wound healing with teriparatide in those without contraindications for its use. Experimental therapy includes bone marrow stem cell intralesional transplantation, low-level laser therapy, local platelet-derived growth factor application, hyperbaric oxygen, and tissue grafting. (c) 2014 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (c) 2014 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据