4.6 Article

Subgroup Variations in Bone Mineral Density Response to Zoledronic Acid After Hip Fracture

期刊

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 12, 页码 2545-2551

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2283

关键词

CLINICAL TRIALS; OSTEOPOROSIS; INJURY; FRACTURE HEALING; FRACTURE PREVENTION; ANTIRESORPTIVES

资金

  1. Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Minimizing post-fracture bone loss is an important aspect of recovery from hip fracture, and determination of factors that affect bone mineral density (BMD) response to treatment after hip fracture may assist in the development of targeted therapeutic interventions. A post hoc analysis of the HORIZON Recurrent Fracture Trial was done to determine the effect of zoledronic acid (ZOL) on total hip (TH) and femoral neck (FN) BMD in subgroups with low-trauma hip fracture. A total of 2127 patients were randomized (1:1) to yearly infusions of ZOL 5mg (n=1065) or placebo (n=1062) within 90 days of operation for low-trauma hip fracture. The 1486 patients with a baseline and at least one post-baseline BMD assessment at TH or FN (ZOL=745, placebo=741) were included in the analyses. Percentage change from baseline in TH and FN BMD was assessed at months 12 and 24 and compared across subgroups of hip fracture patients. Percentage change from baseline in TH and FN BMD at months 12 and 24 was greater (p<0.05) in ZOL-treated patients compared with placebo in most subgroups. Treatment-by-subgroup interactions (p<0.05) indicated that a greater effect on BMD was observed for TH BMD at month 12 in females, in patients in the lower tertile body mass index at baseline (22.6kg/m(2)), and in patients with baseline FN BMD T-score of -2.5; for FN BMD in patients who received ZOL for >6 weeks post-surgery; and for TH and FN BMD in patients with a history of one or more prior fractures. All interactions were limited to the first 12 months after treatment with none observed for the 24-month comparisons. (Clinical trial registration number NCT00046254.) (c) 2014 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据