4.6 Article

Bisphosphonate Use Is Associated With Reduced Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

期刊

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH
卷 28, 期 5, 页码 984-991

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.1792

关键词

BISPHOSPHONATE; MYOCARDIALINFARCTION; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

资金

  1. Novartis
  2. Genetech
  3. Eli Lilly
  4. NIH [1P30AG029716-01]
  5. NIA [2P30AG028716-06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bisphosphonates have been shown to reduce mortality in patients with osteoporotic fractures, but the mechanism is unclear. Bisphosphonates have immunomodulatory effects that may influence the development of vascular disease. We sought to determine if bisphosphonate use is associated with a reduced risk of myocardial infarction (MI) in a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) population with high prevalence of bisphosphonate use and vascular disease. Adult patients with RA enrolled in the National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases, a longitudinal study of RA patients enrolled continuously from U.S. rheumatology practices between 2003 and 2011, were included in the analysis (n=19,281). Patients completed questionnaires every 6 months. including questions on medication use, demographic information, clinical information, and health status. MIs were confirmed by a central adjudicator. Among the 5689 patients who were treated with bisphosphonates at some time during the study period, the risk of MI while on bisphosphonate compared to when not on bisphosphonate was 0.56 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.370.86; p<0.01) after adjustment for multiple confounders. In models including all 19,281 treated and untreated patients, the adjusted risk of first MI was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.540.96; p=0.02) and of all MIs it was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.530.97; p=0.03) in bisphosphonate users compared to nonusers. This finding suggests a potential mechanism for the mortality reduction observed with bisphosphonate medications. (c) 2013 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据