4.6 Article

Postmenopausal osteoporosis treatment with antiresorptives: Effects of discontinuation or long-term continuation on bone turnover and fracture risk-a perspective

期刊

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH
卷 27, 期 5, 页码 963-974

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.1570

关键词

OSTEOPOROSIS; LONG-TERM; DISCONTINUATION; FRACTURE; BONE MINERAL DENSITY; BONE TURNOVER MARKERS

资金

  1. Eli Lilly
  2. Merck
  3. Novartis
  4. Servier
  5. Amgen
  6. Pfizer
  7. Roche-GlaxoSmithKline
  8. MSD
  9. GSK
  10. Sanofi
  11. Warner Chilcott
  12. Roche (Switzerland)
  13. Amgen Inc.
  14. Procter Gamble
  15. sanofi-aventis
  16. Roche
  17. IDS
  18. Servier RD
  19. Acuitas
  20. Nycomed
  21. Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteoporosis may be a lifelong condition. Robust data regarding the efficacy and safety of both long-term osteoporosis therapy and therapy discontinuation are therefore important. A paucity of clinical trial data regarding the long-term antifracture efficacy of osteoporosis therapies necessitates the use of surrogate endpoints in discussions surrounding long-term use and/or discontinuation. Long-term treatment (beyond 34 years) may produce further increases in bone mineral density (BMD) or BMD stability, depending on the specific treatment and the skeletal site. Bisphosphonates, when discontinued, are associated with a prolonged reduction in bone turnover markers (BTMs), with a very gradual increase to pretreatment levels within 3 to 60 months of treatment cessation, depending on the bisphosphonate used and the prior duration of therapy. In contrast, with nonbisphosphonate antiresorptive agents, such as estrogen and denosumab, BTMs rebound to above pretreatment values within months of discontinuation. The pattern of BTM change is generally mirrored by a more or less rapid decrease in BMD. Although the prolonged effect of some bisphosphonates on BTMs and BMD may contribute to residual benefit on bone strength, it may also raise safety concerns. Adequately powered postdiscontinuation fracture studies and conclusive evidence on maintenance or loss of fracture benefit is lacking for bisphosphonates. Similarly, the effects of rapid reversal of bone turnover upon discontinuation of denosumab on fracture risk remain unknown. Ideally, studies evaluating the effects of long-term treatment and treatment discontinuation should be designed to provide head-to-head offset data between bisphosphonates and nonbisphosphonate antiresorptive agents. In the absence of this, a clinical recommendation for physicians may be to periodically assess the benefits/risks of continuation versus discontinuation versus alternative management strategies. (c) 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据