4.6 Article

Relationship of changes in total hip bone mineral density to vertebral and nonvertebral fracture risk in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with once-yearly zoledronic acid 5 mg: The HORIZON-Pivotal Fracture Trial (PFT)

期刊

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH
卷 27, 期 8, 页码 1627-1634

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.1644

关键词

ZOLEDRONIC ACID; BONE MINERAL DENSITY; PINP; FRACTURE; SURROGATE; PERCENT OF TREATMENT EFFECT EXPLAINED

资金

  1. Novartis
  2. Merck
  3. Roche
  4. Amgen
  5. Eli Lilly
  6. Zosano
  7. Radius
  8. Nycomed
  9. Procter Gamble
  10. Servier
  11. Pfizer
  12. Roche-GlaxoSmithKline
  13. NPS
  14. Sanofi-Aventis
  15. AstraZeneca
  16. GSK
  17. Medtronics
  18. Nastech
  19. Nestle
  20. Fonterra Brands
  21. Ono Pharma
  22. Osteologix
  23. Lilly
  24. Sanofi Aventis
  25. Tethys
  26. Unilever
  27. Unipath
  28. Inverness Medical
  29. Warner Chilcott

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Measurements of change in bone mineral density (BMD) are thought to be weak predictors of treatment effect on the reduction of fracture risk. In this study we report an alternative year-on-year approach for the estimation of treatment effect explained by BMD in which we examine the relationship between fracture risk and the most recent change in BMD. We studied 7736 postmenopausal women (ages 65 to 89 years) who were participants in the Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence with Zoledronic Acid Once YearlyPivotal Fracture Trial (HORIZON-PFT) and were randomized to either intravenous administration of zoledronic acid or placebo. The percentage of treatment effect explained by change in total hip BMD was estimated using the alternative year-on-year approach and the standard approach of looking at change over 3 years. We also studied a subset of 1132 women in whom procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (PINP) was measured at baseline and 12 months, to estimate the percentage of treatment effect explained by change in PINP. Regardless of the method used, the change in total hip BMD explained a large percentage of the effect of zoledronic acid in reducing new vertebral fracture risk (40%; 95% CI, 30% to 54%; for the 3-year analysis). The treatment effects for nonvertebral fracture were not statistically significant for the year-on-year analysis but 3-year change in BMD explained 61% (95% CI, 24% to 156%) of treatment effect. Change in PINP explained 58% (95% CI, 15% to 222%) of the effect of zoledronic acid in reducing new vertebral fracture risk. We conclude that our estimates of the percentage of treatment effect explained may be higher than in previous studies because of high compliance with zoledronic acid (due to its once-yearly intravenous administration). Previous studies may have underestimated the relationship between BMD change and the effect of treatment on fracture risk. (C) 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据