4.6 Article

New Variants in the Enpp1 and Ptpn6 Genes Cause Low BMD, Crystal-Related Arthropathy, and Vascular Calcification

期刊

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH
卷 24, 期 9, 页码 1552-1564

出版社

AMER SOC BONE & MINERAL RES
DOI: 10.1359/JBMR.090417

关键词

N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea mutagenesis; Enpp1; Ptpn6; osteopenia; calcification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A large genome-wide, recessive, N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU)-induced mutagenesis screen was performed on a mixed C57BL/6J and C3H.SW-H2/SnJ mouse background to identify genes regulating bone mass. Approximately 6500 male and female G(3) hybrid mice were phenotyped at 8 and 10 wk of age by DXA analysis for evidence of changes in unadjusted or body weight-adjusted BMD or BMC. Phenodeviant lines were identified based on statistical criteria that included a false discovery rate (FDR) <20% and Z-score >2.8. Genome-wide mapping scans were initiated on 22 lines, with evidence of high or low BNID or BMC that deviated by approximately -30% to +50% from the means. Several lines were discontinued as showing lack of heritability, but two heritable lines were identified with narrow chromosomal regions that allowed sequencing of potential mutant candidate genes. Novel mutations were identified in the Enpp1 (C397S) gene on chromosome 1.0 (line 4482) and the Ptpn6 (1482F) gene on chromosome 6 (line 4489) that were both associated with low bone mass. In addition, the phenotype of the Enpp1 mice showed a striking joint disease and calcification of blood vessels including the aorta, myocardium, and renal arteries and capillaries. These results support a role for the Enpp1 gene in the pathogenesis associated with mineralization of articular cartilage and vascular calcification. This work confirms the utility of the chemical mutagenesis approach for identification of potential disease genes and confirms the role of Enpp1, and Ptpn6 in regulating mineralization and skeletal bone mass. J Bone Miner Res 2009;24:1552-1564. Published online on April 27, 2009; doi: 10.1359/JBMR.090417

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据