4.3 Article

Efficacy and safety of eldecalcitol, a new active vitamin D3 analog, in the bone metabolism of postmenopausal women receiving maintenance hemodialysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL METABOLISM
卷 33, 期 2, 页码 213-220

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s00774-014-0582-x

关键词

Eldecalcitol; Bone metabolism; Postmenopausal; Dialysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Eldecalcitol (ELD), a new active vitamin D-3 analog developed in Japan, has attracted attention as an effective osteoporotic therapeutic drug. However, because ELD leads to greater calcium absorption than does conventional active vitamin D-3, it has yet to be used in patients with renal insufficiency. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of ELD treatment in 27 postmenopausal women receiving maintenance dialysis in our institution and underwent ELD treatment (starting at 0.5 mu g/day) for 6 months. The mean serum albumin-corrected calcium (Ca-alb) level was significantly increased following treatment (9.01 +/- A 0.60 before versus 9.56 +/- A 0.55 after treatment, mean +/- A SD). Severe hypercalcemia was prevented through cessation or adjustment of the dosage of calcium-containing phosphate binders or existing active vitamin D. The mean serum phosphorus and intact parathyroid hormone levels were well-controlled throughout. The median levels of bone turnover markers, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b were significantly decreased. The mean lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was increased, a significant difference being observed in age-matched Z-scores (-0.60 +/- A 1.6 versus -0.36 +/- A 1.5, p = 0.018). The average change in lumbar spine BMD after ELD treatment was 3.10 %, and in patients with a T-score of <-4.0, it was 5.63 %. There was no effect on forearm BMD. Although this study is based on short-term observation in a single institution, our results suggest that ELD could be used to increase bone density in dialysis patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据