4.3 Article

Serum sclerostin levels in healthy men over 50 years of age

期刊

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL METABOLISM
卷 31, 期 5, 页码 579-584

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s00774-013-0451-z

关键词

Sclerostin; Cystatin c; Markers of bone turnover; Bone mineral density; Men

资金

  1. OTKA [105073]
  2. TAMOP [4.2.1./B-09/1/KONV-2010-0007]
  3. European Social Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship of serum sclerostin levels with age, cystatin C, bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical markers of bone turnover in healthy Hungarian men > 50 years of age. We determined serum levels of sclerostin and examined its relationship to age, cystatin C, osteocalcin, C-terminal telopeptides of type-I collagen, procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, parathyroid hormone, and L1-L4 (LS) and femur neck (FN) BMD data available from 194 randomly selected ambulatory men belonging to the HunMen cohort. In the study population as a whole [n = 194; age (median, range) 59 (51-81) years], statistically significant correlation was found between sclerostin and age (r = 0.211; p = 0.003), cystatin C (r = 0.246; p = 0.001), FN BMD (r = 0.147; p = 0.041) and LS BMD (r = 0.169; p = 0.019). Compared to middle-aged men (age a parts per thousand currency sign59 years, n = 98), elderly men (age > 59 years, n = 96) had significantly higher serum sclerostin levels (67.8 +/- A 15.9 vs 63.5 +/- A 14 pmol/L; p = 0.047). Among men with normal (T score >-1.0) FN BMD, the elderly had significantly higher serum sclerostin levels compared to the middle-aged men (70.4 +/- A 17 vs 63.9 +/- A 11.5 pmol/L; p = 0.019). Furthermore, among the elderly men cystatin C was the only significant predictor of serum sclerostin levels (standardized regression coefficient (beta) = 0.487; p < 0.001). In the studied healthy elderly cohort, this study reports a significant increase in sclerostin levels with increasing age and deteriorating kidney function as determined by plasma cystatin C levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据