4.6 Article

The Posterior Iliac Crest Outperforms the Anterior Iliac Crest When Obtaining Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Bone Marrow

期刊

JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME
卷 95A, 期 12, 页码 1101-1107

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00429

关键词

-

资金

  1. Regione Emilia-Romagna-University of Bologna Research Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The clinical application of freshly isolated connective-tissue progenitors, as well as the potential preparation of culture-expanded mesenchymal stem cell populations for therapeutic applications, will benefit from clinical methods that maximize the yield of the starting population. We compared the number of cells, concentration, and prevalence of colony-founding connective-tissue progenitors from the anterior and posterior iliac crest.. In addition, we compared the expansion kinetics and multilineage differentiation potential of their culture-expanded progeny when processed to form mesenchymal stem cells. Methods: Marrow aspirate was collected from both the anterior and posterior iliac crest of twenty-two patients. The concentration and prevalence of colony-founding connective-tissue progenitors were estimated with use of a colony formation assay. The expansion kinetics and multilineage differentiation potential of the culture-expanded mesenchymal stem cell populations derived from these starting samples were compared. Results: The yield of colony-founding connective-tissue progenitors was 1.6 times greater in the posterior compared with the anterior iliac crest. No differences were found with respect to the viability, phenotype, expansion kinetics, or multilineage differentiation potential of mesenchymal stem cell populations derived from these two sites. Conclusions: The concentration and yield of colony-founding connective-tissue progenitors were greater when aspirate was obtained from the posterior compared with the anterior iliac crest, whereas the biological potential of the cells derived from these sites appeared comparable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据