4.5 Article

The source of inoculum plays a defining role in the development of MEC microbial consortia fed with acetic and propionic acid mixtures

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 182, 期 -, 页码 11-18

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.04.016

关键词

Microbial electrolysis cells; Hydrogen production; Volatile fatty acids; Pyrosequencing; Microbial ecology

资金

  1. International Found of the Instituto de Ingenieria - UNAM
  2. CONACYT - Mexico [100298]
  3. NSF [1053939]
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1053939] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) can be used as a downstream process to dark fermentation to further capture electron in volatile fatty acids that remain after fermentation, improving this way the viability of the overall process. Acetic and propionic acid are common products of dark fermentation. The main objective of this work was to investigate the effect of different initial concentrations of a mixture of acetic and propionic acids on MECs microbial ecology and hydrogen production performance. To link microbial structure and function, we characterized the anode respiring biofilm communities using pyrosequencing and quantitative-PCR. The best hydrogen production rates (265 mL/d/L-reactor) were obtained in the first block of experiments by MEC fed with 1500 mg/L acetic acid and 250 mg/L propionic acid. This reactor presents in the anode biofilm an even distribution of Proteobacteria, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes and Arcobacter was the dominant genera. The above fact also correlated to the highest electron load among all the reactors. It was evidenced that although defined acetic and propionic acid concentrations fed affected the structure of the microbial consortia that developed at the anode, the initial inoculum played a major role in the development of MEC microbial consortia. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据