4.5 Article

Selection of reference genes for gene expression studies in virus-infected monocots using quantitative real-time PCR

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 168, 期 1, 页码 7-14

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.08.008

关键词

qPCR; Reference gene; Monocots; Viral infection; PR-1

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31100115, 31270184]
  2. earmarked Fund for China Agricultural Research System [CARS-210202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Both genome-wide transcriptomic surveys of the mRNA expression profiles and virus-induced gene silencing-based molecular studies of target gene during virus-plant interaction involve the precise estimation of the transcript abundance. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) is the most widely adopted technique for mRNA quantification. In order to obtain reliable quantification of transcripts, identification of the best reference genes forms the basis of the preliminary work. Nevertheless, the stability of internal controls in virus-infected monocots needs to be fully explored. In this work, the suitability of ten housekeeping genes (ACT, EF1 alpha, FBOX, GAPDH, GTPB, PP2A, SAND, TUB beta UBC18 and UK) for potential use as reference genes in qPCR were investigated in five different monocot plants (Brachypodium, barley, sorghum, wheat and maize) under infection with different viruses including Barley stripe mosaic virus (BSMV), Brome mosaic virus (BMV), Rice black-streaked dwarf virus ( RB S DV) and Sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV). By using three different algorithms, the most appropriate reference genes or their combinations were identified for different experimental sets and their effectiveness for the normalisation of expression studies were further validated by quantitative analysis of a well-studied PR-1 gene. These results facilitate the selection of desirable reference genes for more accurate gene expression studies in virus-infected monocots. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据