4.5 Article

A transcriptional study of acidogenic chemostat cells of Clostridium acetobutylicum-Solvent stress caused by a transient n-butanol pulse

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 161, 期 3, 页码 354-365

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.03.027

关键词

Clostridium acetobutylicum; Phosphate-limited chemostat; Acidogenesis; n-Butanol stress; DNA microarray

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [0315872D]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main product of the anaerobic fermentative bacterium Clostridium acetobutylicum is n-butanol, an organic solvent with severe toxic effects on the cells. Therefore, the identification of the molecular factors related to n-butanol stress constitutes a major strategy for furthering the understanding of the biotechnological production of n-butanol, an important industrial biofuel. Previous reports concerning n-butanol stress in C. acetobutylicum dealt exclusively with batch cultures. In this study, for the first time a comprehensive transcriptional analysis of n-butanol-stressed C. acetobutylicum was conducted using stable steady state acidogenic chemostat cultures. A total of 358 differentially expressed genes were significantly affected by n-butanol stress. Similarities, such as the upregulation of general stress genes, and differences in gene expression were compared in detail with earlier DNA microarrays performed in batch cultivation experiments. The main result of this analysis was the observation that genes involved in amino acid and nucleotide biosynthesis, as well as genes for specific transport systems were upregulated by n-butanol. Our results exclude any transcriptional response triggered by exogenous pH changes or solventogenic n-butanol formation. Finally, our data suggest that metabolic flux through the glycerolipid biosynthetic pathway increases, confirming that C. acetobutylicum modifies the cytoplasmic membrane composition in response to n-butanol stress. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据