4.5 Article

Production of biohydrogen by heterologous expression of oxygen-tolerant Hydrogenovibrio marinus [NiFe]-hydrogenase in Escherichia coli

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 155, 期 3, 页码 312-319

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.07.007

关键词

Biohydrogen; [NiFe]-hydrogenase; Oxygen-tolerance; Hydrogenovibrio marinus; Escherichia coli

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Korea [NRF-2009-0093214]
  2. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxygen sensitivity of hydrogenase is a critical issue in efficient biological hydrogen production. In the present study, oxygen-tolerant [NiFe]-hydrogenase from the marine bacterium, Hydrogenovibrio marinus, was heterologously expressed in Escherichia coli, for the first time. Recombinant E. coli BL21 expressing H. marinus [NiFe]-hydrogenase actively produced hydrogen, but the parent strain did not. Recombinant H. marinus hydrogenase required both nickel and iron for biological activity. Compared to the recombinant E. coli [NiFe]-hydrogenase 1 described in our previous report, recombinant H. marinus [NiFe]-hydrogenase displayed 1.6- to 1.7-fold higher hydrogen production activity in vitro. Importantly, H. marinus [NiFe]hydrogenase exhibited relatively good oxygen tolerance in analyses involving changes of surface aeration and oxygen proportion within a gas mixture. Specifically, recombinant H. marinus [NiFe]-hydrogenase produced similar to 7-to 9-fold more hydrogen than did E. coli [NiFe]-hydrogenase 1 in a gaseous environment containing 5-10% (v/v) oxygen. In addition, purified H. marinus [NiFe]-hydrogenase displayed a hydrogen evolution activity of similar to 28.8 nmol H-2/(min mg protein) under normal aerobic purification conditions. Based on these results, we suggest that oxygen-tolerant H. marinus [NiFe]-hydrogenase can be employed for in vivo and in vitro biohydrogen production without requirement for strictly anaerobic facilities. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据