4.6 Article

Growth dynamics of untreated glioblastomas in vivo

期刊

NEURO-ONCOLOGY
卷 17, 期 10, 页码 1402-1411

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov029

关键词

brain neoplasms/pathology; cell growth processes; glioblastoma; growth dynamics; magnetic resonance imaging

资金

  1. Norwegian University of Science and Technology
  2. National Competence Centre for Ultrasound and Image Guided Therapy
  3. Norwegian National Advisory Unit

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Glioblastomas are primary malignant brain tumors with a dismal prognosis. Knowledge of growth rates and underlying growth dynamics is useful for understanding basic tumor biology, developing realistic tumor models, and planning treatment logistics. Methods. By using repeated pretreatment contrast-enhanced T-1-weighted MRI scans from 106 patients (aged 26-83 years), we studied the growth dynamics of untreated glioblastomas in vivo. Growth rates were calculated as specific growth rates and equivalent volume doubling times. The fit of different possible growth models was assessed using maximum likelihood estimations. Results. There were large variations in growth rates between patients. The median specific growth rate of the tumors was 1.4% per day, and the equivalent volume doubling time was 49.6 days. Exploring 3 different tumor growth models showed similar statistical fit for a Gompertzian growth model and a linear radial growth model and worse fit for an exponential growth model. However, large tumors had significantly lower growth rates than smaller tumors, supporting the assumption that glioblastomas reach a plateau phase and thus exhibit Gompertzian growth. Conclusion. Based on the fast growth rate of glioblastoma shown in this study, it is evident that poor treatment logistics will influence tumor size before surgery and can cause significant regrowth before adjuvant treatment. Since there is a known association between tumor volume, extent of surgical resection, and response to adjuvant therapy, it is likely that waiting times play a role in patient outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据