4.5 Article

Large scale microarray profiling and coexpression network analysis of CHO cells identifies transcriptional modules associated with growth and productivity

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 155, 期 3, 页码 350-359

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.07.011

关键词

Chinese hamster ovary; Gene expression; Microarray; Coexpression analysis; Growth rate; Cell-specific productivity

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [07/IN.1/B1323]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA) was utilised to explore Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell transcriptome patterns associated with bioprocess relevant phenotypes. The dataset set used in this study consisted of 295 microarrays from 121 individual CHO cultures producing a range of biologics including monoclonal antibodies, fusion proteins and therapeutic factors; non-producing cell lines were also included. Samples were taken from a wide range of process scales and formats that varied in terms of seeding density, temperature, medium, feed medium, culture duration and product type. Cells were sampled for gene expression analysis at various stages of the culture and bioprocess-relevant characteristics including cell density, growth rate, viability, lactate, ammonium and cell specific productivity (Qp) were determined. WGCNA identified six distinct clusters of co-expressed genes, five of which were found to have associations with bioprocess variables. Two coexpression clusters were found to be associated with culture growth rate (1 positive and 1 negative). In addition, associations between a further three coexpression modules and Qp were observed (1 positive and 2 negative). Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) identified a number of significant biological processes within coexpressed gene clusters including cell cycle, protein secretion and vesicle transport. In summary, the approach presented in this study provides a novel perspective on the CHO cell transcriptome. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据