4.5 Article

Efficient production of polylactic acid and its copolymers by metabolically engineered Escherichia coli

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 151, 期 1, 页码 94-101

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.11.009

关键词

Polylactic acid; PLA; P(3HB-co-LA); Metabolic engineering; Escherichia coli; Fed-batch culture

资金

  1. Korean Systems Biology Research Project [20100002164]
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  3. LG Chem
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2005-2000364, 과C6A1907] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polylactic acid (PLA) is one of the promising biodegradable polymers, which has been produced in a rather complicated two-step process by first producing lactic acid by fermentation followed by ring opening polymerization of lactide, a cyclic dimer of lactic acid. Recently, we reported the production of PLA and its copolymers by direct fermentation of metabolically engineered Escherichia coli equipped with the evolved propionate CoA-transferase and polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) synthase using glucose as a carbon source. When employing these initially constructed E. coli strains, however, it was necessary to use an inducer for the expression of the engineered genes and to feed succinate for proper cell growth. Here we report further metabolic engineering of E. coli strain to overcome these problems for more efficient production of PLA and its copolymers. This allowed efficient production of PLA and its copolymers without adding inducer and succinate. The finally constructed recombinant E. con JLXF5 strain was able to produce P(3HB-co-39.6 mol% LA) having the molecular weight of 141,000 Da to 20 g l(-1) with a polymer content of 43 wt% in a chemically defined medium by the pH-stat fed-batch culture. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据