4.5 Article

CASOP: A Computational Approach for Strain Optimization aiming at high Productivity

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 147, 期 2, 页码 88-101

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.03.006

关键词

Metabolic engineering; Elementary modes; Strain optimization; Succinate overproduction

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (FORSYS)
  2. MaCS (Magdeburg Centre for Systems Biology)
  3. Ministry of Education and Research of Saxony-Anhalt (Research Center Dynamic Systems)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The identification of suitable intervention strategies increasing the productivity of microorganisms is a central issue in metabolic engineering. Here, we introduce a computational framework for strain optimization based on reaction importance measures derived from weighted elementary modes. The objective is to shift the natural flux distribution to synthesis of the desired product with high production rates thereby retaining the ability of the host organism to produce biomass precursors. The stoichiometric approach allows consideration of regulatory/operational constraints and takes product yield and network capacity - the two major determinants of (specific) productivity - explicitly into account. The relative contribution of each reaction to yield and network capacity and thus productivity is estimated by analyzing the spectrum of available conversion routes (elementary modes). A result of our procedure is a reaction ranking suggesting knockout and overexpression candidates. Moreover, we show that the methodology allows for the evaluation of cofactor and co-metabolite requirements in conjunction with product synthesis. We illustrate the proposed method by studying the overproduction of succinate and lactate by Escherichia coli. The metabolic engineering strategies identified in silica resemble existing mutant strains designed for the synthesis of the respective products. Additionally, some non-intuitive intervention strategies are revealed. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据