4.5 Article

Metabolic flux analysis of a phenol producing mutant of Pseudomonas putida S12: Verification and complementation of hypotheses derived from transcriptomics

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 143, 期 2, 页码 124-129

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.06.023

关键词

Pseudomonas putida S12; Solvent tolerance; Metabolic flux analysis; Phenol; Metabolic engineering

资金

  1. European Union (EFRE)
  2. Ministry of Innovation, Science, Research, and Technology of North-Rhine Westphalia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The physiological effects of genetic and transcriptional changes observed in a phenol producing mutant of the solvent-tolerant Pseudomonas putida SI 2 were assessed with metabolic flux analysis. The upregulation of a malate/lactate dehydrogenase encoding gene could be connected to a flux increase from malate to oxaloacetate. A mutation in the pykA gene decreased in vitro pyruvate kinase activity, which is consistent with a lower flux from phosphoenolpyruvate to pyruvate. Changes in the oprB-1. gntP and gnuK genes, encoding a glucose-selective porin, gluconokinase and a gluconate transporter respectively, altered the substrate uptake profile. Metabolic flux analysis furthermore revealed cellular events not predicted by the transcriptome analysis. Gluconeogenic formation of glucose-6-phosphate from triose-3-phosphate was abolished, in favour ofincreased phosphoenolpyruvate production. An increased pentose phosphate pathway flux resulted in higher erythrose-4-phosphate production. Thus, the availability of these two central phenol precursors was improved. Furthermore, metabolic fluxes were redistributed such that the overall TCA cycle flux was unaffected and energy production increased. Engineering P. putida S12 for phenol production has yielded a strain that channels carbon fluxes to previously unfavourable routes to reconcile the drain on metabolites required for phenol production, while maintaining basal flux levels through central carbon metabolism. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据