4.7 Article

LiCl inhibits PRRSV infection by enhancing Wnt/β-catenin pathway and suppressing inflammatory responses

期刊

ANTIVIRAL RESEARCH
卷 117, 期 -, 页码 99-109

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2015.02.010

关键词

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus; Lithium chloride; Antiviral; Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway; Proinflammatory factor; NF-kappa B signaling pathway

资金

  1. priority academic program development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [A0201200499]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium chloride (LiCl) has been used as a mood stabilizer in the manic depressive disorders treatment. Recent studies show that LiCl is also a potent inhibitor for some DNA and RNA viruses. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is an important viral pathogen in modern pig industry. In this study, we assessed the inhibitory effect of LiCl on PRRSV infection using plque-formation assay, Q-PCR and Western blot analysis. Our results showed that LiCl could inhibit PRRSV infection in MARC-145 and PAM-CD163 cells. Previous reports have shown that LiCl could induce the Wnt pathway in the absence of Wnt ligands. In our studies, we demonstrated that LiCl activates the Wnt pathway in PRRSV infected cells. Additionally, the knockdown of beta-catenin or the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway inhibitor PNU74654 was able to reverse the antiviral effect of LiCl, which suggested that the inhibitory effect of LiCl against PRRSV replication might be associated with the activation of the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. We also found that lower viral replication after LiCl treatment was associated with the reduced mRNA levels of pro-inflammatory IL-8, IL-6, IL-1 beta, tumor necrosis factor a and decreased NE-kappa B nuclear translocation. Collectively, our data demonstrated that LiCl inhibited PRRSV infection by enhancing Wnt/beta-catenin pathway and suppressing pro-inflammatory responses. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据