4.4 Article

Widely targeted metabolic profiling analysis of yeast central metabolites

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCE AND BIOENGINEERING
卷 113, 期 5, 页码 665-673

出版社

SOC BIOSCIENCE BIOENGINEERING JAPAN
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2011.12.013

关键词

Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Widely targeted metabolic profiling analysis; Central metabolism; Quadrupole mass spectrometer; Gas chromatography; Liquid chromatography

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT), Japan
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22780092] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A method for a widely targeted analysis was developed for the metabolic profiling of yeast central metabolism. The widely targeted method consists of 2 analyses, namely, gas chromatography-quadrupole-mass spectrometry (GC-Q-MS) operated in selected ion monitoring mode with 25 m/z channels, and liquid chromatography triple-stage quadrupole (LC-QqQ)-MS operated in multiple reaction monitoring mode. This platform was set up to identify and quantify preselected 99 compounds, including sugars, sugar phosphates, organic adds, amino acids, and cofactors. The method showed good sensitivity and a wide dynamic range. For example, limits of detection for lactate and L-phenylalanine were 1.4 fmol and 2.0 fmol, respectively. The dynamic ranges for GC-Q-MS analysis and LC-QqQ-MS analysis were approximately 10(2)-10(5) and 10(3)-10(4), respectively. The metabolite profiles of 2 yeast strains, YPH499 and BY4741, under glucose-fermenting conditions were compared using the developed method. Although YPH499 and BY4741 were derived from an identical experimental strain, the profiling analysis successfully revealed a variation in metabolic phenotypes among experimental yeast strains demonstrating that the widely targeted method could be a robust and useful method for the investigation of metabolic phenotypes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. (C) 2012, The Society for Biotechnology, Japan. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据