4.4 Article

New insights into galactose metabolism by Schizosaccharomyces pombe: Isolation and characterization of a galactose-assimilating mutant

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCE AND BIOENGINEERING
卷 111, 期 2, 页码 158-166

出版社

SOC BIOSCIENCE BIOENGINEERING JAPAN
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2010.10.007

关键词

Schizosaccharomyces pombe; Gal genes; Galactose metabolism

资金

  1. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) of Japan
  2. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe cannot use galactose as a carbon or energy source, and little is known about galactose metabolism in this species. Here we report isolation of a galactose-assimilating mutant that grows on a medium containing galactose as a sole carbon source through use of a proofreading-deficient DNA polymerase delta variant encoded by cdc6-1. Based on comparative analysis of gene expression profiles in the wild-type and the mutant (FG2-8), we found that SPBPB2B2.10c (gal7(+)), SPBPB2B2.12c (gal10(+)) and SPBPB2B2.13 (gal1(+)), homologous to Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL7, GAL10 and GAL1, respectively, and SPBPB2B2.08, SPBPB2B2.09c, and SPBPB2B2.11 that localize close to the gal genes, were highly expressed and dramatically induced by addition of galactose. The gal7 Delta strain, carrying an integrated ura4(+) marker at the gal7(+) locus, grew on 5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA)-containing medium. In contrast, the FG2-8 gal7 Delta strain could not grow on 5-FOA medium. In addition, expression of ga17(+), SPBPB2B2.13, gal10(+) and gal1(+) genes increased in the wild-type strain when carried on a vector, and these transformants grew on galactose medium. We suggest that gal7(+), gal10(+), and gal1(+) are localized close to a chromosomal terminal repressed by gene silencing in S. pombe. In contrast, gene silencing was defective in the FG2-8 strain making galactose assimilation possible. (C) 2010, The Society for Biotechnology, Japan. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据