4.4 Article

Preparation of artificial skeletal muscle tissues by a magnetic force-based tissue engineering technique

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCE AND BIOENGINEERING
卷 108, 期 6, 页码 538-543

出版社

SOC BIOSCIENCE BIOENGINEERING JAPAN
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2009.05.019

关键词

C2C12 cell; Skeletal muscle; Magnetite; Magnetic force; Tissue engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Artificial muscle tissues composed of mouse myoblast C2C12 cells were prepared using a magnetic force-based tissue engineering technique. C2C12 cells labeled with magnetite nanoparticles were seeded into the wells of 24-well ultralow-attachment culture plates. When a magnet was positioned underneath each plate, the cells accumulated evenly on the culture surface and formed multilayered cell sheets. Since the shapes of artificial tissue constructs can be controlled by magnetic force, cellular string-like assemblies were formed by using a linear magnetic field concentrator with a magnet. However, the resulting cellular sheets and strings shrank considerably and did not retain their shapes during additional culture periods for myogenic differentiation. On the other hand, when a silicone plug was positioned at the center of the well during the fabrication of a cell sheet, the cell sheet shrank drastically and formed a ring-like assembly around the plug. A histological examination revealed that the cells in the cellular ring were highly oriented in the direction of the circumference by the tension generated within the structure. Individual cellular rings were hooked around two pins separated by 10 mm, and successfully cultured for 6 d without breakage. After a 6-d culture in differentiation medium, the C2Cl2 cells differentiated to form myogenin-positive multinucleated myotubes. Highly dense and oriented skeletal muscle tissues were obtained using this technique, suggesting that this procedure may represent a novel strategy for muscle tissue engineering. (C) 2009, The Society for Biotechnology, Japan. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据