4.7 Review

Trends in extreme learning machines: A review

期刊

NEURAL NETWORKS
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 32-48

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2014.10.001

关键词

Extreme learning machine; Classification; Clustering; Feature learning; Regression

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61273233, 41427806]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20120002110035, 20130002130010]
  3. National Key Technology RD Program [2012BAF01B03]
  4. Project of China Ocean Association [DY125-25-02]
  5. Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program [20131089300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extreme learning machine (ELM) has gained increasing interest from various research fields recently. In this review, we aim to report the current state of the theoretical research and practical advances on this subject. We first give an overview of ELM from the theoretical perspective, including the interpolation theory, universal approximation capability, and generalization ability. Then we focus on the various improvements made to ELM which further improve its stability, sparsity and accuracy under general or specific conditions. Apart from classification and regression, ELM has recently been extended for clustering, feature selection, representational learning and many other learning tasks. These newly emerging algorithms greatly expand the applications of ELM. From implementation aspect, hardware implementation and parallel computation techniques have substantially sped up the training of ELM, making it feasible for big data processing and real-time reasoning. Due to its remarkable efficiency, simplicity, and impressive generalization performance, ELM have been applied in a variety of domains, such as biomedical engineering, computer vision, system identification, and control and robotics. In this review, we try to provide a comprehensive view of these advances in ELM together with its future perspectives. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据