4.6 Article

Explicit dosimetry for photodynamic therapy: macroscopic singlet oxygen modeling

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOPHOTONICS
卷 3, 期 5-6, 页码 304-318

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jbio.200900101

关键词

photodynamic therapy; explicit dosimetry; singlet oxygen; mathematical modeling

资金

  1. National Institute of Health (NIH) [RO1 CA109456, PO1 CA87971]
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P01CA087971, R01CA109456] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Singlet oxygen (O-1(2)) is the major cytotoxic agent responsible for cell killing for type-II photodynamic therapy (PDT). An empirical four-parameter macroscopic model is proposed to calculate the apparent reacted O-1(2) concentration, [O-1(2)](rx) as a clinical PDT dosimetry quantity. This model incorporates light diffusion equation and a set of PDT kinetics equations, which can be applied in any clinical treatment geometry. We demonstrate that by introducing a fitting quantity apparent singlet oxygen threshold concentration [O-1(2)](rx,sd), it is feasible to determine the model parameters by fitting the computed [O-1(2)](rx) to the Photofrin-mediated PDT-induced necrotic distance using interstitially-measured Photofrin concentration and optical properties within each mouse. After determining the model parameters and the [O-1(2)](rx,sd), we expect to use this model as an explicit dosimetry to assess PDT treatment outcome for a specific photosensitizer in an in vivo environment. The results also provide evidence that the [O-1(2)](rx), because it takes into account the oxygen consumption (or light fluence rate) effect, can be a better predictor of PDT outcome than the PDT dose defined as the energy absorbed by the photosensitizer, which is proportional to the product of photosensitizer concentration and light fluence. [GRAPHICS] Fitting computed [O-1(2)](rx) profile to the (symbol with std.) observed for 9 mice. The gray area indicates the range of the apparent threshold dose

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据