4.5 Article

Two-photon intravital imaging of thrombus development

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPIE-SOC PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1117/1.3322676

关键词

thrombogenesis; coagulation; hemostasis; laser vascular injury; two-photon imaging; intravital microscopy

资金

  1. Indiana Genetics Initiative (INGEN)
  2. NIH [HL073750, R01-EB004640]
  3. NSF [DMS-0800612, CCF-0515203, CCF-0916606]
  4. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations [0916606] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [0800612] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [P01HL073750] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [R01EB004640] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thrombus development in mouse mesenteric vessels following laser-induced injury was monitored by high-resolution, near-real-time, two-photon, intravital microscopy. In addition to the use of fluorescently tagged fibrin(ogen) and platelets, plasma was labeled with fluorescently tagged dextran. Because blood cells exclude the dextran in the single plane, blood cells appear as black silhouettes. Thus, in addition to monitoring the accumulation of platelets and fibrin in the thrombus, the protocol detects the movement and incorporation of unlabeled cells in and around it. The developing thrombus perturbs the blood flow near the thrombus surface, which affects the incorporation of platelets and blood cells into the structure. The hemodynamic effects and incorporation of blood cells lead to the development of thrombi with heterogeneous domain structures. Additionally, image processing algorithms and simulations were used to quantify structural features of developing thrombi. This analysis suggests a novel mechanism to stop the growth of developing thrombus. (C) 2010 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers. [DOI: 10.1117/1.3322676]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据