4.5 Article

Application of hyperosmotic agent to determine gastric cancer with optical coherence tomography ex vivo in mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

SPIE-SOC PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1117/1.3103341

关键词

hyperosmotic agent; permeability coefficient; tumor tissues; MCG-803 cells; glucose; optical coherence tomography

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30600797, 30873238]
  2. Key Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province of China [2006B35602001, 2007B031401010, 2008B090500125]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Noninvasive tumor imaging could lead to the early detection and timely treatment of cancer. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has been reported as an ideal diagnostic tool for distinguishing tumor tissues from normal tissues based on structural imaging. In this study, the capability of OCT for functional imaging of normal and tumor tissues based on time-and depth-resolved quantification of the permeability of biomolecules through these tissues is investigated. The orthotopic graft model of gastric cancer in nude mice is used, normal and tumor tissues from the gastric wall are imaged, and a diffusion of 20% aqueous solution of glucose in normal stomach tissues and gastric tumor tissues is monitored and quantified as a function of time and tissue depth by an OCT system. Our results show that the permeability coefficient is (0.94 +/- 0.04) x 10(-5) cm/s in stomach tissues and (5.32 +/- 0.17) x 10(-5) cm/s in tumor tissues, respectively, and that tumor tissues have a higher permeability coefficient compared to normal tissues in optical coherence tomographic images. From the results, it is found that the accurate and sensitive assessment of the permeability coefficients of normal and tumor tissues offers an effective OCT image method for detection of tumor tissues and clinical diagnosis. (C) 2009 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers. [DOI: 10.1117/1.3103341]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据