4.5 Article

Three-dimensional photoacoustic imaging by sparsearray detection and iterative image reconstruction

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SPIE-SOC PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1117/1.2992131

关键词

photoacoustic imaging (PAI); optical absorption; three-dimensional imaging; ultrasound array; image reconstruction algorithm; iterative back-projection

资金

  1. Academic Development Fund (ADF) at the University of Western Ontario
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  3. MultiMagnetics, Inc.
  4. Ontario Research and Development Challenge Fund (ORDCF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photoacoustic imaging (PAI) has the potential to acquire 3-D optical images at high speed. Attempts at 3-D photoacoustic imaging have used a dense 2-D array of ultrasound detectors or have densely scanned a single detector on a 2-D surface. The former approach is costly and complicated to realize, while the latter is inherently slow. We present a different approach based on a sparse 2-D array of detector elements and an iterative reconstruction algorithm. This approach has the potential for fast image acquisition, since no mechanical scanning is required, and for simple and compact construction due to the smaller number of detector elements. We obtained spatial sensitivity maps of the sparse array and used them to optimize the image reconstruction algorithm. We then validated the method on phantoms containing 3-D distributions of optically absorbing point sources. Reconstruction of the point sources from the time-domain signals resulted in images with good contrast and accurate localization (<= 1 mm error). Image acquisition time was 1 s. The results suggest that 3-D PAI with a sparse array of detector elements is a viable approach. Furthermore, the rapid acquisition speed indicates the possibility of high frame rate 3-D PAI. (C) 2008 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers. [DOI: 10.1117/1.2992131]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据