4.5 Article

Imaging of zinc oxide nanoparticle penetration in human skin in vitro and in vivo

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

SPIE-SOC PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1117/1.3041492

关键词

nonlinear optical microscopy; nanoparticle toxicity; zinc oxide; transdermal permeability; multiphoton microscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zinc oxide (ZnO-nano) and titanium dioxide nanoparticles (20 to 30 nm) are widely used in several topical skin care products, such as sunscreens. However, relatively few studies have addressed the subdermal absorption of these nanoparticles in vivo. We report on investigation of the distribution of topically applied ZnO in excised and in vivo human skin, using multiphoton microscopy (MPM) imaging with a combination of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and an energy-dispersive x-ray (EDX) technique to determine the level of penetration of nanoparticles into the sub-dermal layers of the skin. The good visualization of ZnO in skin achieved appeared to result from two factors. First, the ZnO principal photoluminescence at 385 nm is in the quiet spectral band of skin autofluorescence dominated by the endogenous skin fluorophores, i. e., NAD[P]H and FAD. Second, the two-photon action cross section of ZnO-nano [sigma((TPEF))(ZnO) similar to 0.26 GM; diameter, 18 nm] is high: similar to 500-fold of that inferred from its bulk third-order nonlinear susceptibility [Im chi((3))(ZnO)], and is favorably compared to that of NAD[P]H and FAD. The overall outcome from MPM, SEM, and EDX studies was that, in humans in vivo, ZnO nanoparticles stayed in the stratum corneum (SC) and accumulated into skin folds and/or hair follicle roots of human skin. Given the lack of penetration of these nanoparticles past the SC and that the outermost layers of SC have a good turnover rate, these data suggest that the form of ZnO-nano studied here is unlikely to result in safety concerns. (c) 2008 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers. [DOI: 10.1117/1.3041492]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据