4.5 Article

Spectral discrimination of live prostate and bladder cancer cell lines using Raman optical tweezers

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

SPIE-SOC PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1117/1.2999609

关键词

Raman optical tweezers; vibrational spectroscopy; prostate cancer; cell lines; principal component analysis; chemometrics

资金

  1. Prostate Cancer Research Foundation (PCRF)
  2. Association for International Cancer Research (AICR)
  3. Medical Research Council [G0500966] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [G0500966] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An investigation into the use of Raman optical tweezers to study urological cell lines is reported, with the ultimate aim of determining the presence of malignant CaP cells in urine and peripheral fluids. To this end, we trapped and analyzed live CaP cells (PC-3) and bladder cells (MGH-U1), because both prostate and bladder cells are likely to be present in urine. The laser excitation wavelength of 514.5 nm was used, with Raman light collected both in back- and forward-scattering geometric configurations. For the backscattering configuration the same laser was used for trapping and excitation, while for forward scattering a 1064 nm laser provided the trapping beam. Analysis of cell-diameter distributions for cells analyzed suggested normal distribution of cell sizes, indicating an unbiased cell-selection criterion. Principal components analysis afforded discrimination of MGH-U1 and PC-3 spectra collected in either configuration, demonstrating that it is possible to trap, analyze, and differentiate PC-3 from MGH-U1 cells using a 514.5 nm laser. By loading plot analysis, possible biomolecules responsible for discrimination in both configurations were determined. Finally, the effect of cell size on discrimination was investigated, with results indicating that separation is based predominantly on cell type rather than cell size. (C) 2008 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers. [DOI: 10.1117/1.2999609]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据