4.5 Article

Silver Nanoparticles Inhibit Vaccinia virus Infection by Preventing Viral Entry Through a Macropinocytosis-Dependent Mechanism

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 9, 期 9, 页码 1624-1635

出版社

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jbn.2013.1659

关键词

Antiviral Agents; Nanoparticles; Silver; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Cytotoxicity; Macropinocytosis; Vaccinia Virus

资金

  1. Ohio Board of Regents
  2. Wright State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silver nanoparticles have been shown to inhibit viruses. However, very little is known about the mechanism of antiviral activity. This study tested the hypothesis that 25-nm silver nanoparticles inhibited Vaccinia virus replication by preventing viral entry. Plaque reduction, confocal microscopy, and beta-galactosidase reporter gene assays were used to examine viral attachment and entry in the presence and absence of silver nanoparticles. To explore the mechanism of inhibition, viral entry experiments were conducted with silver nanoparticles and small interfering RNAs designed to silence the gene coding for p21-activated kinase 1, a key mediator of macropinocytosis. The silver nanoparticles caused a 4- to 5-log reduction in viral titer at concentrations that were not toxic to cells. Virus was capable of adsorbing to cells but could not enter cells in the presence of silver nanoparticles. Virus particles that had adsorbed to cells in the presence of silver nanoparticles were found to be infectious upon removal from the cells, indicating lack of direct virucidal effect. The half maximal inhibitory concentration for viral entry in the presence of silver nanoparticles was 27.4 +/- 3.3 mu g/ml. When macropinocytosis was blocked, this inhibition was significantly reduced. Thus, macropinocytosis was required for the full antiviral effect. For the first time, this study points to the novel result that a cellular process involved in viral entry is responsible for the antiviral effects of silver nanoparticles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据