4.5 Article

Extraction, Purification and Nanoformulation of Natural Phycocyanin (from Klamath algae) for Dermal and Deeper Soft Tissue Delivery

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 9, 期 11, 页码 1929-1938

出版社

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jbn.2013.1741

关键词

Phycocyanin; Protein Extraction and Purification; Phospholipid Vesicle; Topical Delivery; Human Skin

资金

  1. MIUR [PRIN 2010-11, N. 2010H834LS_004]
  2. Sardinia Regional Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the extraction and isolation of a natural anti-inflammatory phycocyanin and its nanofornnulation in innovative and efficient vesicular carriers able to improve its delivery to the skin. C-phycocyanin was successfully isolated from a commercial dry extract (AfaMax (R)) of blue-green Klamath algae. Protein extraction and purity were confirmed by gel electrophoresis (SDS PAGE), MALDI top-down sequencing, Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, and UV absorption. Purified C-phycocyanin was then encapsulated in different phospholipid vesicles: liposomes, ethosomes and Penetration Enhancer containing Vesicles (PEVs), the latter containing the penetration enhancer propylene glycol or Transcutol P. The main colloidal characteristics of the systems were assessed, showing spherical vesicles around 100 nm, negatively charged, with different lamellarity depending on the formulation composition. An in depth investigation on vesicle geometrical properties and morphology was carried out by Small and Wide-Angle X-ray Scattering. Further, the ability of rhodamine-labelled vesicles to allow fluorescent phycocyanin penetration and distribution through human skin was evaluated by Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy, while a complete picture of vesicle-treated skin architecture was gained using Scanning Electron Microscopy. Results indicate that PEVs, especially propylene glycol containing vesicles, are promising carriers for the delivery of the high molecular weight protein phycocyanin to the deep skin layers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据