4.5 Article

Amphotericin B-Loaded Nanocarriers for Topical Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: Development, Characterization, and In Vitro Skin Permeation Studies

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 322-329

出版社

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jbn.2012.1385

关键词

Amphotericin B; Nanoemulsion; Cutaneous Leishmaniasis; Stearylamine; Topical Delivery; Stearylamine; Amphocil (R)

资金

  1. Minas Gerais State Agency for Research and Development (FAPEMIG, Brazil)
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Topical treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis represents an exciting alternative for reducing toxicity associated with parenteral administration of conventional amphotericin B. This work aims to develop and to characterize amphotericin B-loaded new carriers and to investigate their potential for topical delivery by conducting permeation studies with pig ear skin in comparison with marketed formulations. Among other formulations, nanoemulsions were developed and characterized for size, encapsulation efficiency, and zeta potential. To mimic use conditions in topical therapy of cutaneous leishmaniasis, in vitro skin permeation experiments were conducted using a damaged skin model. High encapsulation efficiency (95%) and low particle size (239 nm) were obtained for amphotericin B-loaded nanoemulsion by employing an ion pairing between the drug and stearylamine. Amphotericin B permeation after 24 h across the dermal membrane was low, regardless of the type of formulation tested. In contrast, amphotericin B penetration into dermal membranes (mu g/cm(2)) from solution (control), aqueous Amphocil (R), hydroalcoholic Amphocil (R), Fungizone (R), mixture Fungizone (R)- Lipofundin (R), and NE was 17.5 +/- 4, 15.2 +/- 3, 9.6 +/- 3, 3.5 +/- 1, 1.7 +/- 0.3, and 1.1 +/- 0.1, respectively. Amphocil (R) provided the best results, highlighted by its high improvement of dermal penetration of amphotericin B.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据