4.5 Article

Development of polycaprolactone porous scaffolds by combining solvent casting, particulate leaching, and polymer leaching techniques for bone tissue engineering

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
卷 102, 期 10, 页码 3379-3392

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35010

关键词

polycaprolactone; bone scaffolds; solvent casting/particulate leaching method; polymer leaching method; dual leaching method

资金

  1. Thailand Research Fund (TRF) [DBG5280015]
  2. Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program (doctoral scholarship)
  3. Integrated Innovation Academic Center: IIAC [RES_01_54_63]
  4. Chulalongkorn University Centenary Academic Development Project
  5. Chulalongkorn University
  6. Petroleum and Petrochemical College (PPC), Chulalongkorn University
  7. National Center of Excellence on Petrochemical and Materials Technology (PETROMAT), Thailand
  8. Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sodium chloride and polyethylene glycol (PEG) were used as water-soluble porogens for the formation of porous polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds. The main purpose was to prepare and evaluate in vitro efficacy of highly interconnected, three-dimensional, porous polymeric scaffolds, as obtained from the combined particulate and polymer leaching techniques. Microscopic analysis confirmed the high interconnectivity of the pores and relatively uniform pore size of 378-435 mu m. The PCL scaffolds were further characterized for their density and pore characteristics, water absorption and flow behaviors, and mechanical properties and the potential for their use as bone scaffolding materials was evaluated in vitro using mouse calvaria-derived preosteoblastic cells (MC3T3-E1). Evidently, the use of PEG as the secondary porogen not only improved the interconnectivity of the pore structures but also resulted in the PCL scaffolds that exhibited much better support for the proliferation and differentiation of the cultured bone cells. (C) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据