4.5 Article

Adipose tissue- derived mesenchymal stem cells as monocultures or cocultures with human umbilical vein endothelial cells: Performance in vitro and in rat cranial defects

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
卷 102, 期 4, 页码 1026-1036

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34775

关键词

bone regeneration; adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells; coculture; human platelet lysate; rat cranial defect

资金

  1. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) [08-PSA-M-02]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [50830102]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to compare the osteogenic capacity between human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AT-MSCs) and their cocultures with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) in vitro and their biological performance in vivo. First, the optimal cell ratio in cocultures for osteogenic differentiation was determined by seeding AT-MSCs and HUVECs in ratios varying from 100:0 to 0:100 on tissue culture plates. Afterward, AT-MSCs and AT-MSCs/HUVECs (50:50) were seeded on porous titanium fiber mesh scaffolds (Ti) for both in vitro and in vivo osteogenic evaluation. For in vitro evaluation, cell osteogenic differentiation was assessed by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and calcium assay. For in vivo evaluation, the scaffolds were implanted bilaterally into rat cranial defects (5mm diameter) and bone formation was assessed histologically and histomorphometrically after 8 weeks. The ratio of 50:50 was chosen in the cocultures because this coculture condition retained similar amount of calcium deposition while using the least amount of AT-MSCs. Moreover, AT-MSCs showed higher osteogenic differentiation in comparison to AT-MSCs/HUVECs on Ti in vitro. Furthermore, superior bone formation was observed in AT-MSCs compared to AT-MSCs/HUVECs in rat cranial defects. In conclusion, AT-MSCs showed significantly higher osteogenic potential compared to AT-MSCs/HUVECs both in vitro and in vivo. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 102A: 1026-1036, 2014.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据