4.5 Article

Nano-hydroxyapatite-coated PEEK implants: A pilot study in rabbit bone

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34358

关键词

PEEK; polyetheretherketone; hydroxyapatite; nanotopography; osseointegration

资金

  1. Hjalmar Svensson Foundation
  2. Sigge Perssons & Alice Nybergs Stiftelse (Gothenburg Dental Society)
  3. Wilhelm and Martina Lundgren Science Foundation
  4. Royal Society of Arts and Science in Gothenburg
  5. Swedish Dental Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osseointegration of surface-modified polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants was studied in vivo. A total of 18 cylinder-shaped PEEK implants were inserted in the femurs of nine New Zealand rabbits; half were coated with nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (nanoHA) and half were uncoated controls. Healing time was 6 weeks. Samples were retrieved with the implant and surrounding tissue, processed to cut and ground sections, and analyzed histomorphometrically. The implant surfaces were analyzed with optical interferometry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). NanoHA-coated PEEK surfaces had lower height deviation (Sa) than controls [mean +/- SD: 0.41 mu m (+/- 0.14) vs. 0.96 mu m (+/- 0.28)]. SEM images showed the nanoHA crystals as a thin layer on the polymer surface. XPS analysis of the coated implants showed a Ca/P ratio of 1.67. Histomorphometry indicated that the nanoHA-coated implants had more bone-to-implant contact [16% (+/- 4.7) vs. 13% (+/- 9.3)] and more bone area [52% (+/- 9.5) vs. 45% (+/- 11.9)]. We found no difference between smooth nanoHA-coated cylinder-shaped PEEK implants and uncoated controls. However, higher mean bone-to-implant contact indicated better osseointegration in the coated implants than in the uncoated controls. The large number of lost implants was interpreted as a lack of primary stability due to implant design. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 2013.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据