4.5 Article

N-acetyl cysteine protects osteoblastic function from oxidative stress

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.33211

关键词

antioxidant; hydrogen peroxide; glutathione; reactive oxygen species (ROS); bone

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22791923] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We tested the protective potential of an antioxidant amino acid derivative, N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), in controlling oxidative stress against osteoblasts. Osteoblastic cells extracted from rat bone marrow were cultured. Oxidative stress was induced by adding 100 mu M H(2)O(2) into the culture media. Then, some H(2)O(2)-treated cultures were cotreated with 2.5 or 5 mM NAC. Addition of H(2)O(2) decreased the number of cells to 50% of untreated cultures at days 2. Addition of 5 mM NAC into H(2)O(2) cultures resulted in a dose-dependent increase in the number of cells, with the cell number being 50% greater than that in the 100 mu M H(2)O(2) culture. The gene expression levels of type I collagen, osteopontin, and osteocalcin were downregulated threefold by H(2)O(2) on day 7. The H(2)O(2)-suppressed gene expression was fully recovered by NAC cotreatment. The mineralizing capability, assessed by Von Kossa staining on day 15, were approximately 1.8 times greater in the NAC + H(2)O(2) cotreated group than in the culture with H(2)O(2) alone. These NAC-mediated restorations were associated with an NAC dose-dependent increase of intracellular glutathione and a NAC dose-dependent decrease of intracellular reactive oxygen species. In conclusion, oxidative stress induced by H(2)O(2) substantially impairs the proliferation, differentiation, and mineralization of osteoblasts. More importantly, the addition of NAC into the culture was found to restore these damages to a near normal level due to the improved redox balance, warranting further in vivo studies to test its therapeutic potential as a local antioxidative stress drug. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 99A: 523-531, 2011.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据