4.5 Article

Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles change endothelial cell morphology and mechanics via reactive oxygen species formation

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32972

关键词

endothelial cell; cell morphology; nanoparticle; free radicals; TEM; AFM

资金

  1. Center of Excellence in Environmental Toxicology at the University of Pennsylvania
  2. Nanotechnology Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles are used in various medical applications including magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic hyperthermia, and targeted drug and gene delivery. When used in vivo, these nanoparticles interact with endothelial cells lining all blood vessels, therefore it is crucial to understand endothelial cell functional changes and toxicity upon nanoparticle exposure. We incubated porcine aortic endothelial cells with varying concentrations of bare iron oxide nanoparticles (20-40 nm), and measured cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation, morphology and cytoskeletal organization, death, and elastic modulus. Intracellular ROS increased more than 800% after 3 h of nanoparticle exposure (0.5 mg mL(-1)). Endothelial cells elongated to more than twice their initial length by 12 h, and actin stress fibers formed within the cells. This change in the actin cytoskeleton increased cell elastic modulus by 50%. When ROS formation was blocked using scavengers, initial cell morphology and the actin cytoskeleton remained intact, and cell viability increased. These studies suggest that iron oxide nanoparticles induce ROS formation, which disrupts the actin cytoskeleton and alters endothelial cell morphology and mechanics. If ROS formation is decreased using ROS inhibitors, either as a component of the nanoparticle coating or by systemic administration, higher nanoparticle concentrations might be used with greater efficacy and diminished side effects. (C) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 96A: 186-195, 2011.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据