4.5 Article

Enhancement of bone formation by BMP-7 transduced MSCs on biomimetic nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide composite scaffolds in repair of mandibular defects

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32926

关键词

nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide; porous scaffolds; MSCs; BMP-7; mandibular defects

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [30400506, 30825040]
  2. China 973 Funds [2007CB936102]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study was to evaluate enhanced bone formation by bone morphogenetic protein-7 (BMP-7) transduced MSCs on nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide (n-HA/PA) composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering in repair of mandibular defect. n-HA/PA scaffolds were prepared and rabbit MSCs were separated and expanded; and then infected with adenoviral-mediated BMP-7 in vitro. The MSCs-BMP-7 and MSCs were seeded on the porous scaffolds. Scaffold/MSCs-BMP-7 constructs and scaffold/MSCs constructs were implanted in the defects of rabbits' mandible as the experimental groups A (n = 18) and groups B (n = 18), respectively, the pure scaffolds were implanted as controls (group C, n = 18). Six animals were sacrificed at 4-, 8-, and 16-week postimplantation, respectively. Their mandibles were removed and processed for radiographic, biomechanical tests, histological, and histomorphometric analysis. Group A animals showed greater bone formation and earlier mineralization than group B at 4- and 8-week postimplantation and similarly group B more than group C. However, no difference was found among three groups at 16-week postimplantation. The results of this study suggest that BMP-7 transduced MSCs-n-HA/PA composite could significantly accelerate bone formation in the implant at early stage. BMP-7 mediated ex vivo gene transfer based on MSCs as seed cells, combined with porous n-HA/PA as scaffolds for bone tissue engineering might be an alternative or supplemental approach to repair the mandibular defects. (C) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 95A: 973-981, 2010.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据