4.5 Article

In vivo biodegradation and biocompatibility of PEG/sebacic acid-based hydrogels using a cage implant system

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32810

关键词

in vivo biocompatibility; in vivo biodegradation; PEG sebacic acid diacrylate (PEGSDA); hydrogel; RGD-modified hydrogel; cage implantation

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01AR45871, R01EB003060]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Comprehensive in vivo biodegradability and biocompatibility of unmodified and Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) peptide-modified PEG/sebacic acid-based hydrogels were evaluated and compared to the control material poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) using a cage implantation system, as well as direct subcutaneous implantation for up to 12 weeks. The total weight loss after 12 weeks of implantation for unmodified PEGSDA and RGD-modified PEGSDA in the cage was similar to 42% and 52%, respectively, with no statistical difference (p > 0.05). The exudate analysis showed that PEGSDA hydrogels induced minimal inflammatory response up to 21 days following implantation, similar to the controls (empty cage and the cage containing PLGA discs). Histology analysis from direct subcutaneous implantation of the hydrogels and PLGA scaffold showed statistically similar resolution of the acute and chronic inflammatory responses with development of the fibrous capsule between the PEGSDA hydrogels and the control (PLGA). The cage system, as well as the histology analysis, demonstrated that the degradation products of both hydrogels, with or without RGD peptide modification, are biocompatible without statistically significant differences in the inflammatory responses, as compared to PLGA. (C) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 95A: 191-197, 2010.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据