4.5 Article

Comparative effects of scaffold pore size, pore volume, and total void volume on cranial bone healing patterns using microsphere-based scaffolds

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32015

关键词

bone tissue engineering; porosity; microsphere; scaffold; bone regeneration

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [K01AR052352-01A1]
  2. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases [AR-052352-01A1]
  3. Whitaker Foundation faculty start up funds
  4. National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research [DE-010369-08]
  5. Biotechnology Training Program [T32 GM-008715-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bony craniofacial deficits resulting from injury, disease, or birth defects remain a considerable clinical challenge. hi this study, microsphere-based scaffold fabrication methods were use to study the respective effects of scaffold pore size, open pore Volume, and total void volume fraction on osseous tissue infiltration and bone regeneration in a critical size rat cranial defect. To compare the healing effects of these parameters, three different scaffolds types were fabricated: solid 100 mu m spheres, solid 500 mu m spheres, and hollow 500 mu m spheres. These constructs were implanted into surgically created rat calvarial defects. By 90-days post op, results of micro computed tomography (CT) analysis showed that all scaffolds generated similar amounts of new bone which was significantly greater than untreated controls. Interestingly, the spatial distribution Of new bone within the defect area varied by scaffold group. MicroCT and histological analysis demonstrated healing restricted to the dural side in the hollow 500 mu m group, whereas the solid 500 mu m group demonstrated healing along the dural side and within the center of the defect. Solid 100 mu m groups demonstrated healing along the dural layer, periosteal layer, and within the center of the defect. These results suggest that pore size and closed void volume may both play important roles in scaffold degradation patterns and associated bone healing. (C) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 89A: 632-641, 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据