4.5 Article

Potential use of mucins as biomaterial coatings. II. Mucin coatings affect the conformation and neutrophil-activating properties of adsorbed host proteins-Toward a mucosal mimic

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32315

关键词

mucin-based surface coatings; human neutrophil lipocalin (HNL); surface-exposed protein; protein stabilization; quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring (QCM-D)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In continuation of our recent fractionation and characterization study on mucins of bovine salivary (BSM), porcine gastric (PGM), and human salivary (MG1) origin, this study evaluates the effect of mucin precoating on the conformation and neutrophil-activating properties of host proteins adsorbed to a polyethylene terephthalate-based model biomaterial. Microscopy combined with assays for the neutrophil releases of reactive oxygen species and human neutrophil lipocalin showed that mucin precoating greatly reduced the strong immune-response normally induced by adsorbed immunoglobulin G (IgG) and secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA), respectively. A similar finding was made for the proinflammatory fibrinogen. Although the total uptakes of these proteins depended on the mucin surface concentration, a detailed composite analysis suggested the fraction Of surface-exposed protein to be a stronger determinant of coating performance. The unexpectedly low neutrophil activation showed by composites containing near-monolayer concentrations of exposed IgG and sIgA, respectively, suggested that these act synergistically with mucin on the surface. In support of this hypothesis, quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring measurements revealed that a preadsorbed BSM layer stabilizes IgG through complexation on a polymeric model surface. Our findings link well to the complex in vivo situation and suggest that functional mucosal mimics can be created in situ for improved biomaterials performance. (C) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 91A: 773-785, 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据