4.5 Article

Chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells encapsulated in a hydrogel construct: Neocartilage formation in animal models as both mice and rabbits

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32341

关键词

cartilage tissue engineering; p(NiPAAm-co-AAc); human mesenchymal stem cells; thermosensitive hydrogel; transforming growth factor-beta 3 (TGF-beta 3)

资金

  1. Gyeonggi Regional Research Center (GRRC), Catholic University of Korea
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [핵09A3504] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this Study, hi vivo studies, both nude Mouse and rabbit cartilage defect, were tested for chondrogenesis using stem cells (SCS) using growth factor. Specifically, human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) were embedded in a hydrogel scaffold, which was coencapsulated with transforming growth factor-beta 3 (TGF-beta 3). The specific extracellular matrices (ECMs) released from hMSCs transplanted into the animal were assessed via glycosaminoglycan (GAG)/DNA content, RT-PCR, real time-QPCR, immunohistochemical (IHC), and Safranin-O staining and were observed Lip to 7 weeks after injection. By detection of ECMs the GAG content per cell remained constant for all formulations, indicating that the dramatic increase ill cell number for samples with TGF-beta 3 was accompanied by the maintenance of the cell phenotypes. The histological and IHC staining of the newly repaired tissues observed after treatment with TGF-beta 3 mixed with hMSCs evidenced hyvaline cartilage-like characteristics. Moreover, the results Observed with the animal model (rabbit) treated with hMSCs embedded in the growth factor-containing hydrogel indicate that the implantation of mixed cells with TGF-beta 3 may constitute a clinically efficient method for the,generation of hyaline articular cartilage. (C) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 92A; 988-996, 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据